Your Stats

Total Score
0
Plays
0
Games Tried
0

Discovery Progress

All
0/197
Arcade
0/15
Playground
0/28
Toys & Fidgets
0/14
Creative & Visual
0/113
Music & Sound
0/12
Utilities & Tools
0/15

Arcade

Breakout
Not played
Snake
Not played
Tetris
Not played
Flappy Bird
Not played
Pong
Not played
Whack-a-Mole
Not played
Memory Cards
Not played
Simon Says
Not played
Emoji Catcher
Not played
Typing Race
Not played

Playground

Tic-Tac-Toe
Not played
Connect 4
Not played
2048
Not played
Minesweeper
Not played
Slider Puzzle
Not played
Aim Trainer
Not played
Color Guess
Not played
Number Memory
Not played

Reference points and prospect theory

The big picture

The same outcome can feel different depending on the reference point used to judge gains and losses.

Theoretical modelA model for explaining behavior, not a direct test of this interface’s conversion effects.

Example

A fictional monthly fee of ¥3,000 can look different against a current fee of ¥2,000 or a budget of ¥5,000.

Why it works

Prospect theory describes risky choice using gains and losses relative to a reference point and decision weights. Reference dependence and loss aversion are related but distinct.

On the web

Ask about current costs and required features first. Identify whose reference point is being used and align the product, period and conditions in a price comparison.

When it backfires

Reference points vary and can be hard to observe. A seller’s high reference price need not become the user’s reference point; the model alone does not predict web conversion gains.

Sources

  1. Proposes a model of risky choice based on gains, losses and decision weights.

    Kahneman & Tversky (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Open source

  2. Extends reference-dependent preferences to riskless consumer choice.

    Tversky & Kahneman (1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. Open source