Your Stats

Total Score
0
Plays
0
Games Tried
0

Discovery Progress

All
0/197
Arcade
0/15
Playground
0/28
Toys & Fidgets
0/14
Creative & Visual
0/113
Music & Sound
0/12
Utilities & Tools
0/15

Arcade

Breakout
Not played
Snake
Not played
Tetris
Not played
Flappy Bird
Not played
Pong
Not played
Whack-a-Mole
Not played
Memory Cards
Not played
Simon Says
Not played
Emoji Catcher
Not played
Typing Race
Not played

Playground

Tic-Tac-Toe
Not played
Connect 4
Not played
2048
Not played
Minesweeper
Not played
Slider Puzzle
Not played
Aim Trainer
Not played
Color Guess
Not played
Number Memory
Not played

Informational feedback

Rewards and curiosity

Explain the gap to a goal and what to change, rather than offering praise alone.

Practitioner frameworkA thinking tool for design. Direct tests of its effect are limited.

Example

Editorial example: explain that matching currency units enables comparison instead of merely saying “great”.

Why it works

Hattie and Timperley organize feedback around goals, current progress and next steps, distinguishing task and process information from person-level evaluation.

On the web

Place the issue, reason and correction example together. Check independent correction on a different problem after feedback.

When it backfires

Effects depend on feedback type and prior knowledge in educational research. Lengthy advice after every action can add burden.

Sources

  1. Synthesizes feedback research and distinguishes task, process and self-regulation levels.

    Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. Open source