Your Stats

Total Score
0
Plays
0
Games Tried
0

Discovery Progress

All
0/197
Arcade
0/15
Playground
0/28
Toys & Fidgets
0/14
Creative & Visual
0/113
Music & Sound
0/12
Utilities & Tools
0/15

Arcade

Breakout
Not played
Snake
Not played
Tetris
Not played
Flappy Bird
Not played
Pong
Not played
Whack-a-Mole
Not played
Memory Cards
Not played
Simon Says
Not played
Emoji Catcher
Not played
Typing Race
Not played

Playground

Tic-Tac-Toe
Not played
Connect 4
Not played
2048
Not played
Minesweeper
Not played
Slider Puzzle
Not played
Aim Trainer
Not played
Color Guess
Not played
Number Memory
Not played

Endowment effect

Rewards and curiosity

The value placed on giving something up can differ from willingness to pay to acquire it.

ContestedReplications or meta-analyses disagree. Do not assume the effect.

Example

Consider wanting to keep settings made during a trial, while making export available from the start.

Why it works

Experiments with randomly endowed goods found valuation gaps between sellers and buyers. Trial use and attachment to user-created data are editorial applications, not the same experimental result.

On the web

Let users test settings and evaluate continued use. Explain retention, export and deletion before the trial ends.

When it backfires

Procedures and understanding affect results. Do not assume a trial causes more subscriptions or use fear of losing data to force continuation.

Sources

  1. Reports valuation and trading differences between owners and non-owners of consumption goods.

    Kahneman, Knetsch & Thaler (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Open source

  2. Examines elicitation procedures and participant misconceptions, questioning the robustness of valuation gaps.

    Plott & Zeiler (2005). The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations. Open source